Quantcast The Sidelines
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Students commentate on vice presidential debate at Cyber Café

Jessy Richter

Issue date: 10/6/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Williams engages students in a discussion after the vice presidential debate.
Media Credit: Jay Bailey
Williams engages students in a discussion after the vice presidential debate.

The American Democracy Project hosted a vice presidential debate watch from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. in the Cyber Cafe on Thursday. Afterwards, the group held a short discussion among those who attended.

Jim Williams, history professor and campus coordinator of the ADP, moderated the discussion. He also provided voter registration information before and after the debate.

Zack Barnes, junior psychology, said there were more people than he expected at the debate watch.

He said he thought it was important for students to attend these debate watches.

"It's really good for students to get together and discuss, because we could swing the election," Barnes said.

Williams said it is important for all Americans who are going to vote in this historic election.

"The office of vice president has grown in power and influence since 1993 with Al Gore and Dick Cheney, so probably the next vice president will continue that trend," Williams also said. "As a historian, I think Americans will have to realize that they can no longer ignore the vice presidential candidate as someone who sits on the sidelines."

Kyle Styer, junior physics major, said he agreed with the fact that the vice president's powers have been increasing.

The group at the Cyber on Thursday discussed many questions, one of which was, "Is what the world thinks of us important?"

Katy Coil, junior journalism major, said that the world realizes our choices affect them. Most were in agreement with the idea that world's perception of us is important.

Styer said Palin's strength seemed to be the topic of energy, while the economy was kind of a side point. There were differing opinions throughout the room over who did better than the other overall.

Williams asked the group if they believed either candidate was outright lying. No one mentioned seeing anything as an outright lie, but the source factcheck.org was mentioned as a place to find the candidates' facts' accuracy.

Other question topics covered were health care, meeting with foreign leaders, the importance of gender-if any-in the debate and the ideas of patriotic tax paying.

Barnes and Coil said the debate did not change their opinions at all.

There is another debate watch Tuesday in the State Farm Room of the Business and Aerospace Building from 8 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. with discussion and refreshments following. More information can be found at the ADP's website, mtsu.edu/~amerdem.

This debate watch will be the second between the presidential candidates, and will be aired from Belmont University in Nashville.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 2

cajie

Cajie

posted 10/06/08 @ 5:42 AM CST

Biden made about ten unfactual statements, either he was lying or just made it up, because he didn't know, and wanted to look like he knows everything. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What are your plans over break?
Submit Vote

View Results

Sudoku from SudokuPuzz.com

Get campus news on your desktop!

Sidelines widget now available!

Sidelines Widget

Download now
for Mac OS X 10.4 and above


Advertisement