Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

SGA confronts Aramark

Staff Writer

Published: Monday, November 23, 2009

Updated: Thursday, February 24, 2011 21:02

Members of the Student Government Association expressed concerns about the rising cost of food prices to MT Dining Services staff on Thursday.

MT Dining Services staff attended the weekly SGA meeting to promote a new online food-ordering program for students, and spent much of that time discussing Aramark food prices.

"I understand Aramark needs to make a profit," said Sen. Wesley Hall of the College of Business. "But when I can go to the gas station right across the street to buy an orange juice for a $1, and it costs $3 on campus for the exact same product, that's a 200 percent mark-up."

Many of the student representatives took the opportunity to discuss food prices and a few said they were frustrated with the quality as well. Several senators said that the average price of one meal cost roughly $10, and for many students that is too expensive.

"If there are creative ways to accommodate students' requests for lower prices, we need to look at those possibilities," said At-Large Sen. Drew Dunlop. He said combination meals were a step in the right direction.

John Tate, service director of MT Dining Services, said part of the reason that prices for some items may be higher on campus is because Aramark cannot always compete for the same or lower wholesale cost larger national chain stores are charged.

He said the brand-name food providers offer the same menus, and those prices are usually comparable, if not the same as regular retail prices. He said MT Dining Services works to keep the price and quality of food reasonable.

The MT Dining representatives asked why undergraduate students who do not live on campus are less likely to participate in MT Dining FlexBucks.

"Undergraduate students are not on campus nearly as much as freshmen," said Sen. Deonna Bounds of the College of Mass Communication. She said it is too big of a commitment to purchase FlexBucks or meal plans when many upper classmen are only on campus for a few days a week – often at odd hours when food is no longer served.

"We want to hear feedback from students," said Lindsey Burke, marketing manager for MT Dining Services.

Burke said students can e-mail MT Dining Services with questions or concerns. She said she wants to hear ideas from students.

Vice President of Administration and Public Affairs Sarah Ayache said she appreciated MT Dining Services help in providing hot dogs and drinks during student appreciation week, which was held Nov. 16-20.

"I know many students might not be aware of all of the good things that MT Dining staff does for students," Ayache said. "The SGA was able to provide more games and prizes because they provided the food for free."

Tate and members of his staff met with SGA officers and senators to promote the new ordering system for students, which allows students to pre-pay for food from the MT Dining Web site.

"If a student wants to order a meal before a class, they can order ahead of time and pick it up without having to wait," Tate said.

Tate said the program is designed to cut down on the time students spend waiting in long lines for food in between classes. Students who pre-pay for orders via the WebFood program will be able to enter a separate line from other students, and may eventually be able to order food from their dorm rooms for delivery.

"The WebFood program will eventually be available for the entire campus," Tate said. "Students will need to order their food at least 30 minutes prior to picking it up, so that it can be prepared by our staff."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Apathetic Graduate
Fri Dec 4 2009 20:42
I'm glad this guy's math abilities are the important part of the story to you all...
Seymour Mercury
Wed Dec 2 2009 14:25
The cost of privatization - In the not so distant past, universities had their own kitchen staff. The dining facilities were not expected to turn a profit, only to break even. Private interests have somehow convinced Americans that "free-markets" are the answer to everything. This is emphatically not the case. Throw Aramark out and let the university call the shots.
Pete
Wed Nov 25 2009 15:14
Actually, it is probably closer to 500%. In order to calculate markup you must first know the cost paid for the item by the seller. In the case of orange juice sold at a convenience store for $1, let's assume a "keystone" or 100% markup for that store so they would have bought it for around $0.50. If that item is sold for $3 on campus and the on-campus seller paid $0.50 then the on-campus seller is achieving a 500% markup. ($3 - $0.50) / $0.50
Students face the same dilemma seen in airports until recently: a captive market. What is needed is multiple on-campus providers just like most airports now have multiple restaurants resulting in lower prices and better food.
anti-troll
Mon Nov 23 2009 17:54
it's 200%.
markup = 100 * (sale price - base)/base
= 100 * (3 - 1)/1
= 100 * 2
= 200
Vince
Mon Nov 23 2009 16:30
If Aramark cannot compete like other companies can, then they should not be in business. It is a simple economic statement that if your company cannot compete on the top level, you should not get the same business that other companies do. A company with lower costs is considered a better company when concerning the same products.
Math Hard
Mon Nov 23 2009 11:32
That's actually a 300% mark-up on the orang juice, chief.

Good thing he's a business major.







log out