College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

“Preaching” extremely offensive

Published: Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 23:10

 Preacher Riot

photo by Brandon Cloud, staff photographer

John McGlone of PinPoint of PinPoint Evangelism lies on the sidewalk after falling from a concrete ledge.

“If your daughter was raped, would you ask her what she was wearing?”

This became my battle cry Tuesday. Over the course of two-and-a-half hours, I asked this question dozens of times, screaming at the top of my voice, but I never received an answer.

On my way to philosophy class on Tuesday morning, I encountered three “preachers” carrying vinyl picket signs proclaiming the dangers of hellfire for fornicators, homosexuals, drunkards and “immodest women.” I never made it to class.

Only one of the men was preaching at a time, while the other two held a sign and a video camera, respectively. I approached him and inquired as to why his sign targeted immodest women rather than immodest people.

His reply was that the Bible commands women to dress modestly in order to prevent men from lusting after them and that, “If a woman goes around in revealing clothing, she is responsible for the consequences of her actions.” I asked if that referred to rape, to which he said, “It sure does, young lady.”

I felt shocked beyond sadness and fear. I was angry. I was enraged, actually, that this man would dare to come to a campus half-full of women, one in eight of whom will be raped during her time in college and tell us that we could be held responsible for that.

I began chanting over his message of hate the words, “Rape is never a woman’s fault. Women never deserve to be raped.”

A small crowd began to form and he began to engage me again, taunting me in front of the crowd.

“Have you ever been raped young lady?” he asked me.

Everyone watching us stopped talking and just stared at him, unable to believe he had just asked such a personal and offensive question.

I wavered for a second, my heart sped up and I felt obscenely vulnerable, but I looked at the people around me and realized that lying to him would defeat my whole purpose of confronting him in the first place. My voice did not shake when I responded, “Yes, sir. Have you?”

He then informed me that my problem was that I was making his universal violent and misogynist statements personally.

He said that being raped was the reason that I haven’t been able to enter a relationship with God. When I replied that God and I were on fine terms, he called me a liar.

He told me I hated God, that I was, in fact, God’s enemy. He called me a fornicator. He asked me if being raped made it OK that I am a lesbian.

By this point, a large crowd had gathered. His degradation and hate speech only intensified once he had an audience to fuel him.

He told two Muslim men who came to speak to him that they were going to hell. He told a gay man the same thing. He was belligerent and angry, refusing to answer any questions posed to him.

When the crowd began to get hostile, he stopped talking and indicated that his partner was going to preach now. They tag-teamed like this, angering the crowd and taunting students, calling them fornicators, baby murderers and hypocrites. In short, they incited a riot.

Eventually another young woman ended up directly in front of him, pushed too close by the rapidly intensifying mass of students.

This so-called preacher barred his arm across her chest in an attempt to move her away from him. She stood her ground and loudly requested several times that he remove his arm from her breasts.

She was heard to say by the crowd, “You are sexually assaulting me now. Please stop.”

Campus police and Gene Fitch, dean of student life, saw all of this and did nothing.

However, when the same woman, after having her pleas for him to stop touching her ignored, retaliated, they took action. In an attempt to move him off her, she shoved him away. Due to the rain and the precarious location of the impromptu protest, the man fell to the ground.

Fitch stated that “We can’t appear to condone behavior like that on this campus,” and the woman was arrested.

The man who sexually assaulted her and verbally assaulted hundreds of students was escorted off campus by police “for his own safety” and taken to the hospital. He sustained no serious injuries.

I find this repulsive. I feel violated. I feel as though my university and its administration let me down. When a man is permitted to come uninvited and publicly humiliate students, damn them and even put his hands on them without consequence, it sends an alarming message.

It says that we are not safe on this campus. It says that we do not care about the rights of our women. It says that hate speech is more protected than our bodies.

Arresting this young woman for defending herself was inexplicable and coincided beautifully with the preacher’s message that a woman is responsible if she is raped. She should be commended for having the strength and courage to protect her body from an unprovoked assault.

Then again, what was she wearing?

Ariel Franklyn is a sophomore sociology major.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

41 comments

Drew
Thu Oct 29 2009 20:52
Personal Views - Dead Man Walking is spot on!!

Politically - Freedom of Speech!! "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." -Voltaire Don't get me wrong, I, a devout conservative Christian, find what he said offensive and wrong and a slam against my beliefs. But to say that he should not be allowed on campus because you disagree with him (along with the overwhelming majority of campus) unconstitutional. It is our right as Americans to express our opinions.

Jase Short (MT Solidarity)
Thu Oct 29 2009 20:24
So here is the deal folks.

There is free speech, and there is hate speech.

Hate speech refers to speech which has one purpose and effect: to incite violence, either physically or verbally, and to celebrate violent repression.

In many civilized, industrialized countries--the one's that have more than two parties, universal healthcare, and no military footprint overseas--hate speech is not only unprotected, it is regulated by police forces. Why? Because it is a disturbance to the peace.

MTSU's campus is not one of those places.

We need comprehensive reform of the administration's policies towards free speech. Free speech must be protected and facilitated--often the free speech rights of students are infringed upon.

Can we forget how Students for a Democratic Society initially had its contract as a recognized student organization revoked last year when they applied for a permit to demonstrate in front of the President's mansion? The administration seems to favor outside forces for their conservative religious focus against the legitimate rights of its students. SDS was only reinstated after a coalition between Solidarity and Campus Republicans jointly requested the same right to demonstrate in front of the President's mansion.

Students, its time we respond to this abuse with a united front. Organize!

Libby Knight
Thu Oct 29 2009 17:32
You go, Ariel! I wish I was there instead of in class at the time just so I could kick some nads.
Puddintane
Thu Oct 29 2009 17:16
Not having been there, it sounds as if the "preachers" are terrorists - just as bad as the terrorists that attacked our country on 9/11. They espouse verbal and emotional terrorism. They should be locked up, in my opinion.
prospective student
Thu Oct 29 2009 15:43
Im happy there are enough people out there that see how fucked up this is. I dont believe relgious authorities should be on a non-denominational campus. You offend more people than you turn your way. I wish it wouldnt take an incident like this for students to treat eachother with a little more respect.
Michael Stone
Thu Oct 29 2009 13:47
Very well said Ariel.
thetowercard@yahoo.com
Thu Oct 29 2009 13:43
Thank you, Paul Adkins. I was wondering when someone else who was actually present during the "incident" would post. I agree with you wholeheartedly. Morales entered into McGlone's personal space and McGlone tried to protect himself. Morales went up onto that tiny ledge solely to intimidate the preacher. When intimidation failed, she turned to violence.

Why are so many students praising her? Morales is not some champion of liberalism! The truth of the matter is, the moment you start physically shoving someone around because they have a different point of view (no matter how offensive you find it to be) you've stopped behaving as a liberal. Now, you're just a fascist.

I posted another, longer comment under the other article. Feel free to e-mail me with comments on either of them.

Bob's mom
Thu Oct 29 2009 11:49
Hey Bob, putting your hands on a woman's breasts against her will IS assault.

Funny how if this "preacher" were saying how people deserved to by lynched or beaten because of their race, this guy would be run out of town on a rail (deservedly so.) Would anyone on this comment board defend him? I doubt it, (except for white supremacists.)

But blaming violence against women on the victim is super ok and assaulting a woman is super ok, and unfortunately, that's what many, many men tell themselves to justify committed rape or worse. I commend all those men out their that don't blame Eve for their own eating of the apple, and realize that guys are responsible for *their own actions* before God. My heart goes out to the author and all of my friends who have been raped and too afraid to report it or press charges because the police do not care to pursue these criminals, because you know, it was the woman's fault because she was drugged and raped. Oh, yeah, my friends were wearing jeans and t-shirts at the times of their rapes. Oh, my God she showed her ankles, what a skank! She deserves to be raped! Are you kidding me???!?!?

DO MEN WANT US TO WEAR BURQAS TO CONTROL THEIR SEXUAL URGES? Tennessee is not Saudi Arabia or maybe it should be considering many men's (not all men) attitudes toward women on this campus and in this state.

maybecrazy
Thu Oct 29 2009 11:46
Free speech is rule that the government must follow due to the bill of rights. I dont know about you but I didnt sign the bill of rights. Love them dont get me wrong but as an individuals we can react as long as you are prepared to face the consequences. These men obviously did not think about the consequences of their actions so why should we. Plus poor guy feel like two feet. Sorry but how bad would that have hurt you?
Special K
Thu Oct 29 2009 10:59
This does not require many words. Obviously, this is a very crooked institution. After a while, I consider corruption to be a gimmick, almost a theme at MTSU. All should know that Gene Fitch is all about image. He wouldn't dare think of taking the side of "hostile" students instead of a few religious men exercising a constitutional right. One cannot act surprised at the conservative actions carried out by such shady and uptight officials.
Dead Man Walking
Thu Oct 29 2009 10:41
I have been following this story since it first appeared in the newsletters and am also alarmed. The writer of this report states "It says that hate speech is more protected than our bodies". The term "Hate Speech" is a fairly recent term coined out of a Politically Correct era concerning anything that one single person finds offensive. This term often refers to religious views as well as a host of many other political and social views. The preachers on the MTSU campus probably felt that the adverse comments from the crowd were "hate speech". There are always two sides to every tale.

My engagement here is with the "preachers" themselves.

Christians are charged with spreading a message of love - period. Any Christian that spreads any other message is not worthy of their own religion. Condemning individuals with consequences that only God himself can infer and employ is folly, and no Christian has been empowered to judge or condemn. The fact is, the entire message of Jesus Christ was love above all else - "Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself". Christ loved equally and wholly.

Shame on any Christian for enticing hate, and shame on any Christian who acts to turn the hearts of men and women against Christ. These men do not speak for Christ or his church, they do not speak out of love or forgiveness or humility or truth.

Although there are many in the church today that would say otherwise, Jesus in-fact loves homosexuals, adulterers, fornicators, addicts, liars, thieves, and forgives each and every one of us for our shortcomings - and any person that calls themselves a Christian is expected by God to do the same.

The true message of the love and forgiveness of Christ is offensive to the world because people generally do not like to admit they are personally flawed to any degree, and their hearts have been hardened by the hardships of life itself. To enter into a relationship with Christ is to admit shortcomings and seek forgiveness from the only one who can offer it - GOD. For any person to take a stance of blamelessness is tragic and ego-fueled, and guarantees a life of unhappiness, misfortune and failure, devoid of love.

Whether you personally are an atheist, muslim, christian, jew, hindu, new-ager, or believer of anything thereof or adverse - the FACT is that we all have one short life to live, and one day it will end. LOVE is all that matters and it is the one thing that we all need more of in our small world and short lives.

Zack
Thu Oct 29 2009 09:21
Everything in this article is true, except for the part about Dr. Fitch. It seems that Ariel is stating that Dr. Fitch was standing there and watching at this girl shouted " stop sexually assaulting me". This is completely false. I was in a meeting with him and three other people when someone came and knocked on the door. The person told Dr. Fitch that someone had been pushed down and the cops were being called. So, NO, Dr. Fitch did not stand there and "watch this happen."
Clarissa
Thu Oct 29 2009 09:14
This incident and the proposed consolidation or elimination of the June Anderson Women's Center on the pretext that it provides "duplicate services" stand as testimony to MTSU's dirtiest little secret--women students, staff, and faculty are marginalized, disminished and disempowered on this campus. I attended a "Human Resources" training session on meaningless meetings the other day. When I talked about how men often try to outshout women as a technique to keep them from being heard, forcing the women to talk louder to be heard and then being criticized for being "shrill," I was supported by an older woman who is in charge of a group of male employees on campus. I also noted that this is the reason some all-female political roundtable shows have been developed for television and that women often have to say, "Excuse me, I was talking," or "May I finish my point?" or "Hey, I have the floor, you'll get your turn" just to express an opinion. The male in charge of this "training session" said "Any adult can see you're taking it personally" and dismissed my viewpoint. Male employees are allowed to go anywhere on campus they like with impugnity, while our male boss monitors the comings and goings of a fellow female worker and me. Clerical workers are intimidated by their male bosses for spending an hour-and-a-half at professional development sessions conducted by MTSU on campus because they were gone from their desks longer than their lunch hour. But when job performance evaluation time rolls around, the woman can't point to anything she's done to make herself a better worker because she was afraid to make her boss mad by going to a professional development class! The perfect Catch-22! It's all about power and turf, and in the current economic climate, with layoffs looming over people's heads like the Sword of Damocles, it's only going to get worse. Doesn't anyone know how to behave ethically anymore?
Zack
Thu Oct 29 2009 09:08
Everything seems right except for the fact that Dr. Fitch did not see the incident in question happen. I was physically in a meeting with him and other people when someone knocked on the door to take him away because someone had been pushed and they were calling the cops. You try to make Dr. Fitch look bad, but he was not. He was allowing these men freedom of speech. But HE did not watch them when the incident of assault happen.
Linda Selby
Thu Oct 29 2009 04:59
I am also appalled that the university would give access to outsiders without knowing what their "message" was. We have a large community of gay and lesbian students who deserve respect and not this kind of torment. Who said these "preachers" have any authority to attack our students verbally and most of all physically. This is appalling and we need to assure the safety of our students while on this campus. While I uphold the laws that people are entitled to "free speech," I do not agree that it includes attacks on our young people at this university. Personally, I think that this " "pastor's sermon" would be better served in his church of like-minded individuals. For all men and women that have suffered the humiliating and degrading experience: Rape is never the woman's fault and this man is an idiot.
Susan
Thu Oct 29 2009 04:22
first off, excellent article. secondly, i must commend you for not feeling shame for what happened to you and standing up to these men. it's so common for people to feel the need to hide the fact that they were raped, and thankfully, that is slowly but surely changing. the victim is never to blame, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation or experience, religion, and especially clothing. even if rape was about sex and lust, which it is not, it is the offender's responsibility to control his or her actions, rather than the victim's responsibility to control that person. since rape is typically about power, i really don't see what clothing has to do with anything.

i too was raped. my clothing was extremely wholesome. i was drugged before and nearly beaten to death after the rape and on later occasions as the man, a serial rapist, stalked me. i would LOVE to see what these ignorant fools have to say about that. at the same time, i'm very glad i was not there because after the things i've been through, i doubt i would have handled the situation in as civil a manner as did ms. morales. those men deserve so much more than what she caused. she was simply protecting herself.

this whole situation makes me physically ill. the fact that such horrible, ignorant people even exist is so disturbing. they go around to college campuses all over trying to entice people to fight them, while videotaping so that they can show what great martyrs they are for christ. it's ridiculous and repulsive. surely they could be arrested for starting a riot or sexual assault or something. as far as i'm concerned, these men are just as worthless as rapists, and should be treated as such.

bobster
Thu Oct 29 2009 02:28
good grief. free speech is not designed to protect you from being offended. pushing one down the stairs is not free speech. it is assault.
J Smith
Thu Oct 29 2009 02:11
It seems overall, these preachers on campus are doing more harm than good. When do we hear stories of miraculous mass conversions to Christianity, rather, their particular brand of it anyway? Rarely. How often does conflict occur whenever these so called messengers of god appear on the Knoll? Too often. Perhaps this type of religious propaganda should be moved to a different area, at the very least, if not banned altogether from campus. Free speech should be free, but MTSU is supposed to be an educational institution for those wanting to further themselves intellectually, not a boiling pot for over righteous zealots to stir up whenever they please.
Paul Adkins
Thu Oct 29 2009 01:43
This article was great and I was completely with you on how awful the "preachers" were, but then you completely tarnished your credibility by spreading more falsities about the incident that lead to the arrest of the young woman. First, she was not pushed towards him. She walked up the back way to be behind him on the knoll ledge, then she pushed her way in between the "preacher" and another person (a young male student). His arm was already out to give him space between himself and the young man when she pushed her way in. Also, since he was much taller than her, his arm was located just above her breasts, not touching them. Second, let me provide you with her EXACT words since you seem to not be able to remember them for yourself:

(Almost immediately when she pushes her way in between his arm, THAT IS ALREADY OUT, and the male student): "Get the F*** off me!" (this statement being ridiculous because she is the one that is on him)
"Get your hand off my breast now! Get your hand off my breast NOW!! (These statements being ridiculous because his hand is holding his umbrella and is completely away from her breasts, and because, again, his arm is located slighty above her breasts.)

She never once mentioned anything about "you are sexually assualting me now," and she most certainly didn't say "please" at any time during her yelling. I think she definitely wanted people to believe he was touching her inappropriately, as to have an excuse for assaulting him, but that simply wasn't the case.

Look, I didn't like these "preachers" anymore than you did, hence I loved the beginning of your article, but maybe next time you'll seek out the whole truth, you know, like people in news business actually should.

Oh, in case you're wondering, all my claims are fact based on my cell phone video footage, not opinion. I was literally inches behind the "preacher" the whole time he was on that knoll ledge recording his every word, so I had front row seats to the altercation when it occured.

sophomore
Thu Oct 29 2009 01:16
I finally get to hear from someone who actually has a well-informed opinion. Of all the stories and rumors I've heard around campus, this lets us know what REALLY happened. I agree with you. These men went overboard and actually had a bad rep before ever coming to our campus. It's our fault it got so out of hand because we made a scene. We fueled them. It could have been prevented. But Micaela should not have been arrested and her arrest only backs up these men and empowers them. Since she asked repeatedly for Don to not touch her, and he HAPPENED to be on ledge about 3 feet off the ground, he fell to his ultimate goal. He milked it. He went to the hospital and is going to go home with his story to tell his other radial Christian friends about the incident and make US look worse.

I would have pushed the jerk.







log out